Showing posts with label atheism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atheism. Show all posts

Wednesday, 21 October 2015

Event Report: Atheism research at the 2015 IAPR World Congress

http://blog.nsrn.net/2015/10/19/event-report-atheism-research-at-the-2015-iapr-world-congress/

Event Report: Atheism research at the 2015 IAPR World Congress

In this post, Thomas Coleman discusses the conference the International Association for the Psychology of Religion (IAPR) 2015 World Congress (17th-20th August 2015). Coleman takes us on a tour of the conference, through panels of interest to him on topics of atheism, disbelief and nonreligious mystical, or transcendent, experience.

Monday, 8 December 2014

Mindfulness’ “truthiness” problem: Sam Harris, science and the truth about Buddhist tradition

http://www.salon.com/2014/12/06/mindfulness_truthiness_problem_sam_harris_science_and_the_truth_about_buddhist_tradition/

Mindfulness’ “truthiness” problem: Sam Harris, science and the truth about Buddhist tradition

  Saturday, Dec 6, 2014 03:45 PM UTC

Sam Harris wants practitioners out of religion business. But the supposed science behind it is its own mythology

Thursday, 24 July 2014

NewYorker: Is That All There Is ?

http://www.vox.com/2014/7/23/5926393/10-new-yorker-religion-articles-to-read-while-the-archives-are-free

Is That All There Is?

by James Wood
Subtitled "Secularism and its discontents," this essay by James Wood is a thought-provoking attempt to grapple with the ramifications of secularism, which, he writes, "can seem as meaningless as religion when … doubt strikes." Though this piece is, in a sense, a review of an essay collection titled The Joy of Secularism, Wood's astute interaction with it proves him to be much more than another book reviewer — he's a critic, and he's precisely the kind of critic the religion world should be paying attention to. (Wood's polemic on the New Atheists is another fascinating read.)
"How can it be that this world is the result of an accidental big bang? How could there be no design, no metaphysical purpose? Can it be that every life-beginning with my own, my husband's, my child's, and spreading outward-is cosmically irrelevant?" …
These are theological questions without theological answers, and, if the atheist is not supposed to entertain them, then, for slightly different reasons, neither is the religious believer. Religion assumes that they are not valid questions because it has already answered them; atheism assumes that they are not valid questions because it cannot answer them. But as one gets older, and parents and peers begin to die, and the obituaries in the newspaper are no longer missives from a faraway place but local letters, and one's own projects seem ever more pointless and ephemeral, such moments of terror and incomprehension seem more frequent and more piercing, and, I find, as likely to arise in the middle of the day as the night.

Tuesday, 22 July 2014

Vox: From Nietzsche to Richard Dawkins: a conversation on modern atheism

http://www.vox.com/2014/7/20/5912283/from-nietzsche-to-richard-dawkins-a-brief-history-of-modern-atheism

Vox:From Nietzsche to Richard Dawkins: a conversation on modern atheism

..
Various scholars have pointed out that New Atheist critiques of religion fall short because they've misrepresented faith, caricatured believers, and engaged in the same fundamentalism they were allegedly impugning.
..